Question about what he said

User avatar
Jsw09
Newbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 9:26 am
Contact:

Postby Jsw09 » Fri Jun 21, 2002 9:32 am

I've read in a bunch of different magizene's that Josh thought he was like a sckawny little thing, and that he wouldn't do nude scenes...welll then how come he changed his mind while doing 40 days and 40 nights? im not complaining or anything, just wondering.

User avatar
JoShYsLiLhO
Member
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 10:01 pm
Location: dumbass dothan
Contact:

Postby JoShYsLiLhO » Fri Jun 21, 2002 11:48 am

[color=red] [B] He gets naked in it???????? i havent seen it yet so i dunno but like does it show nethin????? wow thas funny! haha i dunno y but it is! lmao!

User avatar
laura l
Supreme Member
Posts: 2690
Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2002 12:23 pm
Contact:

Postby laura l » Fri Jun 21, 2002 5:02 pm

IF HE LIED HE NEEDS NOT WORRY! HE'S FORGIVEN!!!
:lickout: :lickout: :lickout:

(Edited by laura l at 7:02 pm on June 22, 2002)

User avatar
joshluvr
Advanced Member
Posts: 254
Joined: Sat Mar 02, 2002 3:52 pm
Location: california!!! Santa Barbra roks!!!
Contact:

Postby joshluvr » Fri Jun 21, 2002 9:21 pm

i did read somewhere that he said he was a skrawny little thing, but if a director or someone told him that if he takes off his shirt or something to get more people (girls) in the theater, he'd challenge it. dose he really get naked in 40 days and 40 nights?? i didn't see it, our movie theater is so small, it dosn't get very many movies. well ttyl

User avatar
Jsw09
Newbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 9:26 am
Contact:

Postby Jsw09 » Fri Jun 21, 2002 11:39 pm

Well you don't actually see anything in the movie...well, unclothed at least. But I read in an interview on some website that he said he had to do get naked, and it makes sense for some of the scenes that were in the movie..or to maybe attach the prosthesis, who knows. If i find the site/interview again, I'll post it up.

User avatar
Jsw09
Newbie
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jun 21, 2002 9:26 am
Contact:

Postby Jsw09 » Fri Jun 21, 2002 11:41 pm

Oh, and Maybe the director suggested that, but i would think he would know before hand...and besides all the topless girls in that movie could attract a million guys.

User avatar
CooL BeanS ChicA
Member
Posts: 146
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2002 7:59 pm
Location: Josh's Heart
Contact:

Postby CooL BeanS ChicA » Wed Jun 26, 2002 10:29 pm

Yea, for some odd reason Josh thinks he is scrawny and doesn't see why all of us go gaga over him!! He's so silly!!

But I hate to break it to ya, no nude Josh is 40 Days... My biggest complaint was that there were countless breasts seen throughout the movie, but not a speck of Josh!! I think you see his chest and that's it. Bummer!

User avatar
Jackyouup
Newbie
Posts: 13
Joined: Sun Jun 16, 2002 11:12 pm
Contact:

Postby Jackyouup » Wed Jun 26, 2002 11:05 pm

well... actually when he is having sex with this girl and gets up you see a bit of a 'side-view' but it's nothing really.

User avatar
sblw24
Newbie
Posts: 28
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2002 11:54 pm
Contact:

Postby sblw24 » Thu Jun 27, 2002 12:29 am

The movie was good but I agree about the breast thing. There was one scene where Josh is flying through a sky filled with breasts. It was the corniest thing I have ever seen. aside from that it was a funny movie.

User avatar
JoShYsLiLhO
Member
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Apr 09, 2002 10:01 pm
Location: dumbass dothan
Contact:

Postby JoShYsLiLhO » Mon Jul 01, 2002 1:29 am

[color=red] [B] yah i know that parts gonna sux but hay nethin 2 c joshy! haha


Return to “Josh Hartnett”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest